- plan: assignment status table, five landed architecture decisions
(propose-validate, context_schema DI, verbatim alignment, no LangGraph
Server/SDK with rationale, 2004 semantics), real-model eval results
(collection 12/12; photo_skip 0/4 and no_false 2/8 share the '对'
routing pattern), three open questions with next actions, code map
- 2004 task rewritten as plate-confirm with both paths whitelisted
- graduation requirement reworded: illegal transitions never committed
- README: current status section pointing to plan appendix
Architecture (mirrors workflow/20261016 chatNode structure):
- events.py: client markers parsed to typed ClientEvent (sources
verified against workflow JSON); plain text like '拍好了' is not an event
- transitions.py: LEGAL_TRANSITIONS whitelist drafted from chatNode
prompts and Condition edges (16 entries, each with source_ref);
is_legal_transition rejects unlisted/terminal-violating moves
- graph.py: multi-node graph (collect/single_photo/dual_photo/...
matching workflow chatNodes), route_by_stage conditional edges,
_fake_llm_propose simulates LLM stage-code proposals (assignment 4
replaces with real LLM); code only keeps context bookkeeping
(no_reply_count) and validation
- state.py: expanded domain fields (pending_question, accident/
person fields, clarify/no-reply counts, turn_patch, state_version)
Key finding: 单车拍照#6/双车拍照#7 are browser_addon branches ending
at 0000, so 2005/2015 allow both 300x (direct) and 0000.
Verified: pytest 87 passed (24 transition/event tests newly green).
Known limit: stage proposals come from a fake LLM; per-stage scripts
and real LLM integration are assignments 4-5.
- Updated ANALYSIS_AUTH_TOKEN and APP_ID in the .env file for enhanced security and configuration.
- Added a comprehensive migration plan document for transitioning the LangGraph backend, detailing the background, scope, goals, and architectural decisions for the project.
Eric Wang