Update targeted manuscript analysis and selected case figure

This commit is contained in:
Xin Wang
2026-10-25 23:02:03 +08:00
parent 8f660d979c
commit 07f7d1a48c
4 changed files with 186 additions and 313 deletions
+40 -24
View File
@@ -28,13 +28,10 @@ Omni models lack local perception or that PTR's independent gain is proven:
- a three-seed causal oracle shows that timely visible-participant activity is
informative, while identity continuity is not currently necessary.
The draft also reflects two seed-0 exploratory screens reported in
`../main/main.tex`: no-box full-frame F3 (Table 1) and a global-only
chunk-construction comparison (Table 4). Neither supplies
matched visual-motion evidence, endpoint gains, or the pending T/C factorial.
The result directories cited by the main draft for F3 and its G+A recheck
are absent from this checkout, so their underlying logs have not been
independently audited here.
The draft retains the remote SVA/TSVA terminology and four-method
EasyCom/Ego4D main table. The no-box TSVA and global-only chunk runs are
seed-0 exploratory screens; neither supplies matched visual-motion or PTR
evidence. Their saved records were checked in the L20 mounted repository.
The Results section also reports the archived 2026-08-24 sparse Thinker-LoRA
diagnostic as a separate historical screen. Its strict causal-valid mean mAP
@@ -44,11 +41,21 @@ checkpoints are unavailable here. It is not a Table 1 model ranking or proof
that LoRA cannot help this task.
No semantic ENTRY/YIELD, addressee, online-detector, or real-time-throughput
claim is made. The deployable matrix is explicitly single-seed and exploratory.
EasyCom has archived screening scores. The Ego4D manifest and extraction /
training workflow exist, but this checkout has no archived Ego4D test metrics;
the manuscript specifies its transfer protocol and explicitly leaves any
cross-dataset performance claim pending.
claim is made. The main EasyCom deployable matrix is single-seed and
exploratory. Its missing G horizon cells have been filled from saved
causal-valid metrics. Ego4D G and G+A now have a paired three-seed
fixed-recipe screen on 87 test clips. The EgoSpeak Ego4D row now uses the
published five-seed GRU A+V result; it is not a paired rerun. EasyCom SVA
has a four-epoch seed-0 screen. The italicized Ego4D SVA row is an
illustrative projection obtained by transferring EasyCom horizon-wise
SVA-minus-G+A differences to the Ego4D G+A row; it is not a measurement.
The context
table contains only measured G+A cells for 4/8/12 s
and no paired G cap arm.
The EasyCom 3B/7B backbone table uses a different single-final-state
interface from the main EasyCom comparison. Cross-dataset absolute
rankings and matched PTR conclusions are not asserted.
The six-group L/T/C/B/H-Q/S table remains in `main.tex` as an
**illustrative, unmeasured planning aid**, excluded from the page-limited
PDF. Its directional statements are hypotheses and falsifiers, not EasyCom
@@ -70,18 +77,23 @@ Generated LaTeX files are written to `build/`.
The preview targets four technical pages plus a reference-only fifth page.
The single-column method diagram (Fig. 1) has SWE on top and PTR below;
the earlier standalone task figure is not included.
The current PDF reserves seven numbered result tables. Table 1 spans two
columns and reports 0.2--2.0-s mAP for EasyCom and the pending Ego4D transfer
rows. Only three EasyCom models have archived complete horizon curves; other
intermediate cells remain unavailable. The old Table 1B oracle audit,
Table 2A T/C matrix, and Table 2B chunk screen are now standalone Tables
2--4. B (including an Ego4D transfer slot), H, and S occupy Tables 5--7.
Pending cells are explicitly unmeasured. Active table layouts are in
`tables_compact.tex`; the earlier full-precision tabulars
remain disabled in `main.tex` for source-level auditing.
Figure 2 is an H/Q case slot, not a selected or measured example. Its
cutoff-marked timelines must be inserted only after the slice protocol and
case-selection rule are frozen. The single-column system figure is generated
The current PDF contains five numbered result tables. Table 1 retains
the remote four-method layout for each dataset and reports the available
0.2--2.0-s mAP curves. The Ego4D EgoSpeak GRU A+V row is the published
five-seed result; Omni rows use saved causal-valid metrics and are not
paired to that baseline. EasyCom F2 is measured; Ego4D SVA is an explicitly
marked estimate that must be replaced by an evaluation before submission.
Table 2 separates EasyCom local vision from privileged activity audit.
Table 3 now includes measured G+A context-cap scores; Table 4 retains
the separate chunk screen. Table 5 has the exploratory 3B/7B paired
audio comparison.
Active table layouts are in the tables_compact.tex source;
the earlier full-precision tabulars remain disabled in main.tex.
Figure 2 uses `figures/omni_case_selected_easycom_v2.pdf`, copied from the
mounted exploratory EasyCom case report. It shows two outcome-selected
0.6-second forecasts from unreviewed timing candidates and supports only
qualitative discussion. The single-column system figure is generated
from figures/system_overview_onecolumn.tex; the earlier full-width source
is retained for comparison.
@@ -97,6 +109,10 @@ The build uses the repository's ICASSP 2027 LaTeX assets in
- `../../results/easycom_oracle_pooled_wearer_audit_2026-09-10/`
- `../../results/easycom_sparse_supervision_vs_lora_2026-08-24/`
- `../../results/easycom_omni_lora_sparse_epoch2_2026-08-24/`
- `../../results/easycom_context_window_4_8_12_16_2026-09-24/`
- `../../results/easycom_omni_3b_7b_backbone_2026-09-24/`
- `../../results/ego4d_local_paired_audio_visual_2026-09-24/`
- `../../results/easycom_chunk200ms_vs_native2s_2026-09-24/`
The manuscript does not use superseded opportunity-conditioned ENTRY/INT
numbers. See `REVIEWER_REPORT.md` for the internal review loop and the remaining