Add annotated fixed-horizon floor evaluation

This commit is contained in:
Xin Wang
2026-09-15 02:27:48 +08:00
parent 3a127a3f9f
commit 2ab56f48d7
7 changed files with 1099 additions and 38 deletions
+101
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
# EasyCom human-annotated fixed-horizon floor-event evaluation
This protocol evaluates saved EgoSpeak-layout dense predictions against
human-confirmed `WEARER_ENTRY`, `INT_YIELD`, and hard-negative opportunities.
It is separate from the timing-derived proxy in
[`evaluate_floor_state_changes.py`](../evaluate_floor_state_changes.py).
## Scoring contract
At each nominal 0.2--2.0 second horizon:
- a positive entry is one corrected 5 Hz behavior-anchor bin, scored by wearer
activity probability;
- a positive INT-yield is one corrected 5 Hz behavior-anchor bin, scored by one
minus wearer activity probability;
- a hard negative is one opportunity sample, scored by the maximum erroneous
action probability over its annotated half-open region;
- a positive timestamp is never expanded into a tolerance window;
- an excluded or unreviewed candidate never enters scoring.
The prediction layout is `[target_time, class, future_horizon]`. Event frames
are rasterized from the original 20 Hz annotation with the same `frame // 4`
rule used by the EasyCom event derivation. A human `-0.2/0/+0.2` second boundary
correction shifts the resulting target bin; for hard negatives it shifts the
whole region.
The reported horizon is the nominal EgoSpeak forecast-bin horizon. Because an
acoustic boundary can occur anywhere inside a 200 ms target bin, do not
reinterpret it as an exact continuous-time lead without separately reporting
the quantization convention.
## Development smoke run
Use only training-side sessions while the annotation and region rules are
being audited:
```bash
python3 evaluate_annotated_floor_events.py \
--reviews reports/easycom_event_reviews/reviews.jsonl \
--run egospeak=/path/to/egospeak/result \
--sessions Session_12 \
--matched-recalls 0.7 0.8 0.9 \
--print-event-examples 3 \
--output reports/easycom_annotated_floor_events/session12_summary.json
```
This selects thresholds on the same development events and labels the threshold
source as exploratory. It is not a confirmatory test command.
## Confirmatory test run
Thresholds must be selected independently for entry and INT at every horizon
from training-side out-of-fold predictions:
```bash
python3 evaluate_annotated_floor_events.py \
--reviews reports/easycom_event_reviews/test_reviews.jsonl \
--run baseline=/path/to/baseline/test_result \
--run candidate=/path/to/candidate/test_result \
--sessions Session_3 Session_2 Session_1 \
--calibration-reviews reports/easycom_event_reviews/oof_train_reviews.jsonl \
--calibration-run baseline=/path/to/baseline/oof_result \
--calibration-run candidate=/path/to/candidate/oof_result \
--calibration-sessions Session_4 Session_5 Session_6 Session_7 Session_8 Session_9 Session_10 Session_11 Session_12 \
--matched-recalls 0.7 0.8 0.9 \
--print-event-examples 3 \
--output results/easycom_annotated_floor_events_YYYY-MM-DD/summary.json
```
The CLI rejects evaluation involving official Sessions 1--3 unless calibration
reviews and calibration sessions are supplied. The
`--allow-in-sample-thresholds` override is exploratory only.
Outputs:
- `summary.json`: protocol metadata, counts, ten horizons per family, AP and
operating points;
- `summary_metrics.csv`: one row per run, family, horizon, and requested recall;
- `summary_events.csv`: one scored row per run, annotated opportunity, and
horizon for alignment audits and paired analysis.
Before comparing models, verify identical positive, hard-negative, and invalid
counts. The headline manuscript operating point is the nominal 0.2 second bin
at matched recall 0.8; ten-horizon entry/INT AP and all horizon curves are
supporting results.
## Required audit before freezing
1. Print examples and verify the 20 Hz boundary, 5 Hz target row, horizon, and
valid mask against the source timeline.
2. Confirm that every positive occupies one target row.
3. Confirm that each hard-negative region contributes one max-pooled score,
not one negative per frame.
4. Audit continuous timeline segments without candidate hints to estimate
candidate recall.
5. Freeze the annotation guide, region endpoints, boundary-correction policy,
and out-of-fold calibration procedure before inspecting Sessions 1--3.
This evaluator does not emit committed actions or detection latency. Those
require a separately frozen online controller with threshold, persistence,
refractory period, matching interval, and competing-risk rules.