Update targeted ICASSP 2027 manuscript and results

manuscript/targeted/REVIEWER_REPORT.md

@@ -78,10 +78,23 @@ the science.
    causal active-speaker/floor estimator and require correct-time evidence to
    beat delayed, removed, and capacity-matched controls. Otherwise retain the
    honest audio-local paper and remove visual-method language.
-5. Rebuild with the official 2027 kit, keep technical content within four
-   pages, put only references on an optional fifth page, and retain the IEEE
-   AI-assisted drafting disclosure.
+5. Recheck the four-page technical limit after inserting results. The current
+   build uses the 2027 kit and puts only references on page five; retain the
+   IEEE AI-assisted drafting disclosure.
 
 Passing gates 1--3 would support a solid ICASSP empirical paper. Passing gate
 4 with a meaningful matched-recall behavior gain would support the stronger
 method paper originally envisioned.
+
+## Review 4: expanded five-page working preview
+
+The layout now uses four pages for technical content and a fifth page for
+references only. The Introduction includes a causal task timeline; the
+method figure separates deployable inputs from privileged audit labels. The
+results presentation has measured main/oracle tables and a clearly labeled
+six-group **illustrative scenario** with explicit falsifiers. This improves
+readability and makes the intended experimental logic reviewable, but it does
+not raise the scientific verdict above borderline: L/T/C/B/H-Q/S values and
+full-pipeline efficiency remain unmeasured, and the scenario cannot be cited
+as evidence. Re-review after gates 1--4 and replacement of the scenario table
+with actual per-seed/per-session results.