Add competing-risk evaluation and align ICASSP story

manuscript/main/README.md

@@ -25,32 +25,28 @@ main/
   build/            # generated, ignored
 ```
 
-The author/affiliation, final results, Method, Experimental Setup, Results and
-Conclusion are still explicit TODOs. Do not turn planned experiments into
-reported findings.
+The manuscript is intentionally a content skeleton with visible TODOs. Do not
+turn planned implementations, controls, or results into completed claims.
 
-The current paper thesis is model-agnostic and deliberately narrower than
-addressee prediction. It asks whether general-purpose omni representations
-expose the fine-grained evidence needed for 200 ms wearer floor-action
-projection, whether PEFT can recover it, and whether causal local audio/person
-evidence provides a reliable complement. The initial planned backbone set is:
+The frozen paper story is documented in
+[`../../docs/icassp2027_acceptance_storyline_2026-09-10.md`](../../docs/icassp2027_acceptance_storyline_2026-09-10.md).
+The paper asks how long-context Omni understanding can be adapted into
+sub-second, wearer-relative floor control for an invisible egocentric wearer.
+Its single candidate contribution is a causal local floor-evidence adapter:
 
-- Qwen2.5-Omni-3B;
-- Qwen2.5-Omni-7B;
-- MiniCPM-o 4.5.
+- Qwen2.5-Omni-3B is the primary global backbone;
+- matched LoRA/PEFT is a baseline, not a separate contribution;
+- Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is an optional capacity-scaling control;
+- the primary local method uses an anonymous, no-ID visible-person set;
+- track continuity is conditional and must defeat no-ID/shuffled/capacity
+  controls before entering the paper;
+- MiniCPM-o and a cross-family sweep are removed from the core plan;
+- the oracle is analysis-only motivation, not a deployable method or headline;
+- the publication gate is lower competing-risk-censored multi-other false
+  entry at matched wearer-onset recall without worse valid onset or yield.
 
-The backbone and final fusion method are **not frozen yet**. Current Qwen-3B
-numbers are exploratory motivation, not evidence that every omni model has the
-same limitation. Compare frozen, PEFT, and local-evidence protocols within each
-backbone; report common local encoders separately from model-native local
-encoders. Raw cross-model scores are secondary because the models expose
-different streaming/readout interfaces.
-
-Track-consistent person fusion remains one candidate after pooled and
-capacity-matched controls. If selected, dataset participant IDs route
-short-term causal state only; they are not semantic inputs. The publication
-gate is an event-level reduction in multi-other false entries at matched
-wearer-onset recall without degrading onset latency or wearer-yield behavior.
-A general omni claim requires a consistent result across at least two backbone
-families; otherwise the paper must state a model-specific finding. Selected
-examples are explanatory evidence only.
+Competing-risk censoring and training-side threshold calibration are now
+implemented and unit-tested. The remaining P0 blocker is the real-data event
+audit and protocol/scenario freeze; until then, event values are timing-derived
+proxies. Already viewed Sessions 1--3 numbers are exploratory internal evidence
+and must not appear in the confirmatory paper table.