From 6e44e55eea3c84773dee9b1210ed882c2bf627e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xin Wang Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2026 19:12:49 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Remove pending efficiency table from targeted draft --- manuscript/targeted/main.tex | 26 ++++---------------------- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) diff --git a/manuscript/targeted/main.tex b/manuscript/targeted/main.tex index aac1209..64b3196 100644 --- a/manuscript/targeted/main.tex +++ b/manuscript/targeted/main.tex @@ -361,24 +361,6 @@ Overlap (negative) & -- & n/a & -- \\ \end{tabular} \end{table} -\begin{table}[t] -\caption{S result slots: full-path cost on the same hardware (unmeasured). -Include I/O and block transitions; logical 5 Hz is not measured throughput.} -\label{tab:efficiency} -\centering\normalsize -\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt} -\begin{tabular}{@{}lccc@{}} -\toprule -Stage & P50 ms & P95 ms & Peak GB \\ -\midrule -Completed block & -- & -- & -- \\ -Observed tail & -- & -- & -- \\ -Local path + head & -- & -- & -- \\ -Full path & -- & -- & -- \\ -\bottomrule -\end{tabular} -\end{table} - \section{Experiments} \label{sec:experiments} @@ -547,10 +529,10 @@ at 0.2~s (67.05 versus 59.62\% mAP), but use 95,453 rather than 9,539 processor calls over 12 sessions. Completed blocks plus observed tail reach 70.85\%; that older bank is not extraction-matched. Freshness and chunk construction vary together, so this is motivation for, not evidence of, an -isolated PTR benefit or real-time throughput. Table~\ref{tab:stream_context} -reserves the matched tail $\times$ audio and context-cap tests. -Tables~\ref{tab:backbone}-- -\ref{tab:efficiency} reserve backbone, hard-slice, and cost analyses; the +isolated PTR benefit or real-time throughput. +Table~\ref{tab:stream_context} reserves the matched tail $\times$ audio +and context-cap tests. Tables~\ref{tab:backbone} and +\ref{tab:hard_slices} reserve backbone and hard-slice analyses; the cutoff-marked H/Q case in Fig.~\ref{fig:hq_cases} remains unmeasured. \textbf{Historical LoRA diagnostic.} A single-run EasyCom 8-s/2-FPS screen used sparse training anchors (1~Hz,