Remove pending efficiency table from targeted draft

manuscript/targeted/main.tex

@@ -361,24 +361,6 @@ Overlap (negative) & -- & n/a & -- \\
 \end{tabular}
 \end{table}
 
-\begin{table}[t]
-\caption{S result slots: full-path cost on the same hardware (unmeasured).
-Include I/O and block transitions; logical 5 Hz is not measured throughput.}
-\label{tab:efficiency}
-\centering\normalsize
-\setlength{\tabcolsep}{3pt}
-\begin{tabular}{@{}lccc@{}}
-\toprule
-Stage & P50 ms & P95 ms & Peak GB \\
-\midrule
-Completed block & -- & -- & -- \\
-Observed tail & -- & -- & -- \\
-Local path + head & -- & -- & -- \\
-Full path & -- & -- & -- \\
-\bottomrule
-\end{tabular}
-\end{table}
-
 \section{Experiments}
 \label{sec:experiments}
 
@@ -547,10 +529,10 @@ at 0.2~s (67.05 versus 59.62\% mAP), but use 95,453 rather than 9,539
 processor calls over 12 sessions.  Completed blocks plus observed tail reach
 70.85\%; that older bank is not extraction-matched.  Freshness and chunk
 construction vary together, so this is motivation for, not evidence of, an
-isolated PTR benefit or real-time throughput. Table~\ref{tab:stream_context}
-reserves the matched tail $\times$ audio and context-cap tests.
-Tables~\ref{tab:backbone}--
-\ref{tab:efficiency} reserve backbone, hard-slice, and cost analyses; the
+isolated PTR benefit or real-time throughput.
+Table~\ref{tab:stream_context} reserves the matched tail $\times$ audio
+and context-cap tests. Tables~\ref{tab:backbone} and
+\ref{tab:hard_slices} reserve backbone and hard-slice analyses; the
 cutoff-marked H/Q case in Fig.~\ref{fig:hq_cases} remains unmeasured.
 \textbf{Historical LoRA diagnostic.}
 A single-run EasyCom 8-s/2-FPS screen used sparse training anchors (1~Hz,