Files
icassp2027-experiment/manuscript/main/README.md
T

57 lines
2.2 KiB
Markdown

# Main ICASSP manuscript
This is the editable paper directory. It uses the unmodified official ICASSP
2026 LaTeX assets stored in `../ICASSP2026_Paper_Templates/`. When the ICASSP
2027 author kit is released, replace or add the official template and update
`TEMPLATE_DIR` in the Makefile only after checking the new instructions.
Compile from this directory:
```bash
make
```
The PDF and all intermediate files are written to `build/`; only source files
belong in Git.
Current source layout:
```text
main/
main.tex
references.bib
Makefile
README.md
build/ # generated, ignored
```
The author/affiliation, final results, Method, Experimental Setup, Results and
Conclusion are still explicit TODOs. Do not turn planned experiments into
reported findings.
The current paper thesis is model-agnostic and deliberately narrower than
addressee prediction. It asks whether general-purpose omni representations
expose the fine-grained evidence needed for 200 ms wearer floor-action
projection, whether PEFT can recover it, and whether causal local audio/person
evidence provides a reliable complement. The initial planned backbone set is:
- Qwen2.5-Omni-3B;
- Qwen2.5-Omni-7B;
- MiniCPM-o 4.5.
The backbone and final fusion method are **not frozen yet**. Current Qwen-3B
numbers are exploratory motivation, not evidence that every omni model has the
same limitation. Compare frozen, PEFT, and local-evidence protocols within each
backbone; report common local encoders separately from model-native local
encoders. Raw cross-model scores are secondary because the models expose
different streaming/readout interfaces.
Track-consistent person fusion remains one candidate after pooled and
capacity-matched controls. If selected, dataset participant IDs route
short-term causal state only; they are not semantic inputs. The publication
gate is an event-level reduction in multi-other false entries at matched
wearer-onset recall without degrading onset latency or wearer-yield behavior.
A general omni claim requires a consistent result across at least two backbone
families; otherwise the paper must state a model-specific finding. Selected
examples are explanatory evidence only.